From: Steven Lo Vullo (email@example.com)
Date: Sun Mar 19 2000 - 18:28:32 EST
Even so, Jim West described AGAPAW and its derivatives as a love "which
requires and expects nothing in return." Surely you would agree that texts
such as John 3:19, 12:43, 2 Timothy 4:10, and 1 John 2:15, even with the
heaviest hand, could not be pressed into this mold!
----- Original Message -----
From: Carl W. Conrad <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Biblical Greek <email@example.com>
Cc: Biblical Greek <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2000 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: A question from a novice!
> At 2:15 PM -0500 3/19/00, Mike Sangrey wrote:
> >On the one hand, it is usually prudent to be as precise as we can; so to
> >"ALWAYS in the sense of self giving love" is perhaps too strong. And
> >the context of the NT, it would be very hard to separate the two ideas of
> >'self giving' and 'high regard' in any given occurrence.
> Particularly as Alexander Kyrychenko has just called attention to:
> 'DHMAS GAR ME EGKATELIPEN AGAPHSAS TON NUN AIWNA (2Tim 4:10)
> 'This is neither LXX nor "self giving love which requires and expects
> nothing in return."'
> Unless, of course, one really wants to be heavy-handedly ironic, and claim
> that Demas' love 'this present age' is something for which he sacrificed
> Carl W. Conrad
> Department of Classics/Washington University
> One Brookings Drive/St. Louis, MO, USA 63130/(314) 935-4018
> Home: 7222 Colgate Ave./St. Louis, MO 63130/(314) 726-5649
> WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/
> B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
> You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [email@example.com]
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to
> To subscribe, send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:41:02 EDT