From: Mike Sangrey (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Mar 20 2000 - 13:57:58 EST
Harold R. Holmyard III <email@example.com> said:
> John 10:17 does not involve the idea that the 'participant loves
> and takes action'. The Father did not love and take action, giving the
> command. The Father commanded and then loved the Son because He obeyed
> the command to lay down his life."
Allow me to acknowledge this as a good point. Hmmmmmm....I like thought
provokers. Your statement is not a contradiction to the AGAPAW<->Action
hypothesis, though, just a contradiction to what I said.
-- Mike Sangrey firstname.lastname@example.org Landisburg, Pa. There is no 'do' in faith, everywhere present within it is 'done'.
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [email@example.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:41:02 EDT