From: Steven R. Lo Vullo (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Nov 23 2000 - 20:53:50 EST
On 11/23/00 7:34 PM, clayton stirling bartholomew wrote:
> I think you will discover that the new BAGD is quite different from L&N. I
> don't think anyone will want pass up getting the latest from work Fredrick
> Danker just because they have L&N. IMHO that would be a serious mistake.
> Comparison of these two works is a little unfair since they are conceived
> with different functions in view. L&N is really a tool designed specifically
> for translators using computers. It is not a general purpose lexicon. L&N
> provides very little in the way of historical information (i.e., citations
> form ancient sources).
I agree 100% with what you said. The two tools clearly have their own
distinctive functions and purposes. I am also one of those guys "standing in
line" to get my copy of BDAG, looking forward to it very much. I was only
responding to the suggestion that giving priority (or at least "equal time")
to definitions over glosses is somehow "revolutionary."
Steve Lo Vullo
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [email@example.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:42 EDT