[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Economists on ecology (Re: GOODBY MIKE!)
-
Subject: Re: Economists on ecology (Re: GOODBY MIKE!)
-
From: dlj@inforamp.net (David Lloyd-Jones)
-
Date: 6 Dec 1996 00:37:34 GMT
-
Article: 16994 of alt.sustainable.agriculture
-
Newsgroups: alt.politics.economics, alt.sustainable.agriculture, sci.agriculture, sci.econ, sci.energy, sci.environment
-
Organization: 3x5 cards, Day Timer, luck
-
References: <56q0os$kn5@news1.io.org> <E13A50.Lu0@planet.mh.dpi.qld.gov.au> <hardhead-ya023180001911960225580001@news.mindspring.com> <E15pJD.K9F@planet.mh.dpi.qld.gov.au> <32947F46.2198@ilhawaii.net> <3297F745.133E@mail.snet.net> <587p00$m4o@news.inforamp.net>
-
Reply-To: dlj@pobox.com
-
Xref: newz.oit.unc.edu alt.politics.economics:94669 alt.sustainable.agriculture:16994 sci.agriculture:16844 sci.econ:61477 sci.energy:59710 sci.environment:114019
On 6 Dec 1996 00:22:24 GMT, dlj@inforamp.net (David Lloyd-Jones)
wrote:
>Some are, some aren't. Most of them are just dolts, as far as I can
>see. Many of them, however, are intelligent, well-informed, and
>sensible people who are appalled by the style of Democratic politics.
>The good news is we now have Dick Armey and Phil Gramm to show that
>Republicans can be every bit as coarse as Democrats.
>
Lloyd-Jones,
Does it maybe occur to you that this may be the reason for their
recent successes?
-dlj.
References: