vtca <vtca@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
adiyEn was not stating on my own that sEshatvam is
("might be") destroyed. I was only quoting what pUrvAcharyas
have said and what latter day acharyas have coommented on
them. Mumukshuppadi says clearly "azhikkum pOdhu" and all
commentaries that I have seen and heard on this state that
this refers to sEshatvam. One member in this forum said that
this means that simply the bhAvam is destroyed. I do not buy
that argument, as it sounds like the jIva is trying to fool
the Lord.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Sriman Venkatesan,
By SEshatva bhAvam, I meant any ahankAram associated with it, i.e. we are
SEsham on our own. As I have been saying, we remain for Him in a way He wishes.
Take the case of BG 14-6. No commentary explains how sattva guNa binds us.
Someone thought and analyzed. According to her, it is not on its own but
because of our associated ahankAram. Otherwise it looks as if BG 14-6 supports
advaitam.
Vishnu
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/.itolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ramanuja-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |